police car: have bears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents car
Weight: 0.79
, vehicle
Weight: 0.79
, police officer
Weight: 0.77
, truck
Weight: 0.69
Siblings police
Weight: 0.73
, bus
Weight: 0.60
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bears 1.00
have teddy bears 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(truck, have teddy bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(police car, have bears)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(police car, have bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(truck, have teddy bears)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(police car, have bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(truck, have teddy bears)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(truck, have teddy bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(police car, have bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(police car, have bears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(police car, have bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(police car, have bears)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(police car, have bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(police car, have teddy bears)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(police car, have bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(police car, have teddy bears)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(police car, have bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(police car, have teddy bears)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(police car, have bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(police car, have teddy bears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(police car, have bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(police car, have bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(police car, have bears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(police car, have bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(police car, have bears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(police car, have bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(truck, have teddy bears)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(police car, have bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(truck, have teddy bears)