police department: do lip sync challenges

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fire department
Weight: 0.77
, police
Weight: 0.67
, state
Weight: 0.67
, department
Weight: 0.65
Siblings state police
Weight: 0.85
, fbi
Weight: 0.53
, police officer
Weight: 0.40
, police dog
Weight: 0.38
, policeman
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
do lip sync challenges 1.00
do lip sync battle 0.92
is lip syncing 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(police department, do lip sync challenges)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(police department, do lip sync challenges)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(police department, do lip sync challenges)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(police department, do lip sync battle)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(police department, do lip sync challenges)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(police department, do lip sync battle)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(police department, do lip sync challenges)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(police department, do lip sync battle)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(police department, do lip sync challenges)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(police department, is lip syncing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(police department, do lip sync challenges)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(police department, do lip sync battle)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(police department, do lip sync challenges)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(police department, is lip syncing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(police department, do lip sync challenges)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(police department, is lip syncing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(police department, do lip sync challenges)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(police department, is lip syncing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(police department, do lip sync challenges)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(police department, do lip sync challenges)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(police department, do lip sync challenges)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(police department, do lip sync challenges)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(police department, do lip sync challenges)