police dogs: be valuable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.70
Siblings police dog
Weight: 0.42
, small dog
Weight: 0.39
, beagle
Weight: 0.37
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.37
, rottweiler
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be valuable 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(police dogs, be valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be valuable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(police dogs, be valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(police dog, be valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(police dog, be valuable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(police dogs, be valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(police dogs, be valuable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(police dogs, be valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(police dogs, be valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(police dogs, be valuable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(police dogs, be valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(police dogs, be valuable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(police dogs, be valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(police dog, be valuable)