police officer: use math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.76
, police
Weight: 0.76
, public servant
Weight: 0.70
, investigator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings police car
Weight: 0.77
, police dog
Weight: 0.73
, security guard
Weight: 0.68
, sergeant
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
use math 1.00
use science 0.80
use geometry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(police, use math)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(police officer, use math)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(police, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(police, use math)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(police, use math)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(police officer, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(police officer, use math)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(police officer, use science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(police officer, use science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(police officer, use science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(police officer, use geometry)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(police officer, use geometry)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(police officer, use science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(police officer, use geometry)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police officer, use geometry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(police officer, use math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(police officer, use math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(police, use math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(police officer, use math)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(police, use math)