political party: have conventions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents party
Weight: 0.85
, third party
Weight: 0.74
, movement
Weight: 0.68
, issue
Weight: 0.63
Siblings socialist party
Weight: 0.87
, conservative party
Weight: 0.87
, labour party
Weight: 0.87
, liberal party
Weight: 0.86
, democratic party
Weight: 0.85

Related properties

Property Similarity
have conventions 1.00
hold conventions 0.96
have political conventions 0.94
avoid conventions 0.94
hold national conventions 0.93
avoid contested conventions 0.87
hold convention 0.84
hold national convention 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(political party, have conventions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(party, hold national conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(political party, have conventions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(party, have political conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(political party, have conventions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(party, have conventions)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(party, have political conventions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(party, hold national conventions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(party, have political conventions)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(party, hold national conventions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(party, have conventions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(political party, have conventions)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(party, have political conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(political party, have conventions)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(party, hold national conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(political party, have conventions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(political party, have conventions)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(political party, have political conventions)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(political party, have political conventions)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(political party, hold national conventions)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(political party, have political conventions)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(political party, hold national conventions)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(political party, have political conventions)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(political party, hold national convention)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(political party, hold national convention)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(political party, hold national conventions)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(political party, hold national convention)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(political party, hold national convention)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(political party, hold national conventions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(political party, have conventions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(political party, have conventions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(party, have conventions)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(party, have political conventions)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(party, hold national conventions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(party, have conventions)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(party, have political conventions)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(political party, have conventions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(party, hold national conventions)