polling booth: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents voter
Weight: 0.42
Siblings conservative
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality right 0.90
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality evil 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(polling booth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(conservative, has quality right)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(polling booth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(conservative, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(conservative, has quality right)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(polling booth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(polling booth, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(polling booth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(polling booth, has quality bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(polling booth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(polling booth, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(polling booth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(polling booth, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(polling booth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(polling booth, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(polling booth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(polling booth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(polling booth, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(polling booth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(polling booth, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(polling booth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(conservative, has quality right)