polling booth: is auckland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents voter
Weight: 0.42
Siblings conservative
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
is auckland 1.00
hate george soros 0.75
be afraid of neil degrasse tyson 0.75
love ron paul 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(polling booth, is auckland)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(conservative, be afraid of neil degrasse tyson)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(polling booth, is auckland)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(conservative, be afraid of neil degrasse tyson)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(conservative, be afraid of neil degrasse tyson)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(polling booth, is auckland)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(polling booth, is auckland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(polling booth, is auckland)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(polling booth, is auckland)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(polling booth, is auckland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(polling booth, is auckland)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(polling booth, is auckland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(polling booth, is auckland)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(conservative, be afraid of neil degrasse tyson)