pollution: be at ocean

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, cost
Weight: 0.57
, benefit
Weight: 0.57
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.66
, smog
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, erosion
Weight: 0.32
, odor
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at ocean 1.00
be at sea 0.89
be at lake 0.76
be at underwater 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(pollution, be at ocean)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(pollution, be at sea)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be at sea)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(pollution, be at lake)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be at lake)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(pollution, be at underwater)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pollution, be at sea)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be at underwater)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(pollution, be at underwater)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pollution, be at lake)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pollution, be at sea)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(pollution, be at lake)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pollution, be at underwater)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be at ocean)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pollution, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pollution, be at ocean)