pollution: be bad for humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.66
, smog
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, desertification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for humans 1.00
be harmful to humans 0.89
affect humans animals 0.88
be bad for animals 0.87
be dangerous to animals 0.80
be harmful to animals 0.80
be bad for birds 0.80
affect creatures 0.77
affect aliens animals 0.76
affect living creatures 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for humans)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for animals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(pollution, be harmful to animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pollution, be harmful to animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(pollution, be harmful to animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be harmful to animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for animals)