pollution: be dangerous for health

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.66
, smog
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, desertification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous for health 1.00
be bad for human health 0.87
is dangerous 0.87
be considered hazard 0.77
be harmful to environment 0.76
arise in health professions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(smog, is dangerous)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for human health)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for human health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for human health)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(air pollution, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(air pollution, is dangerous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(overpopulation, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is dangerous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(smog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(smog, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(pollution, be dangerous for health)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(pollution, be harmful to environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pollution, is dangerous)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pollution, be harmful to environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pollution, is dangerous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pollution, is dangerous)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(pollution, is dangerous)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(pollution, be harmful to environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be harmful to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be dangerous for health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pollution, be dangerous for health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for human health)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(smog, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be dangerous for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(air pollution, is dangerous)