polo: be bad for horse

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shirt
Weight: 0.61
, brand
Weight: 0.60
, sport
Weight: 0.60
, name
Weight: 0.54
, game
Weight: 0.51
Siblings golf club
Weight: 0.34
, tennis
Weight: 0.33
, cricket
Weight: 0.33
, soccer
Weight: 0.33
, golf course
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for horse 1.00
be play on horse at high speed 0.81
be good for child 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sport, be good for child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(polo, be bad for horse)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(polo, be bad for horse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sport, be good for child)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(polo, be bad for horse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sport, be good for child)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sport, be good for child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(polo, be bad for horse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(polo, be bad for horse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(polo, be bad for horse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(polo, be bad for horse)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(polo, be bad for horse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(polo, be play on horse at high speed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(polo, be bad for horse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(polo, be play on horse at high speed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(polo, be bad for horse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(polo, be play on horse at high speed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(polo, be bad for horse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(polo, be play on horse at high speed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(polo, be bad for horse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(polo, be bad for horse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(polo, be bad for horse)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(polo, be bad for horse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(polo, be bad for horse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(polo, be bad for horse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sport, be good for child)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(polo, be bad for horse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sport, be good for child)