polysaccharide: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents compound
Weight: 0.65
, amino acid
Weight: 0.64
, extracellular matrix
Weight: 0.62
, macromolecule
Weight: 0.52
Siblings starch
Weight: 0.67
, maltose
Weight: 0.57
, sucrose
Weight: 0.54
, disaccharide
Weight: 0.46
, cysteine
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality worth 0.82
is good for 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(macromolecule, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(macromolecule, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(polysaccharide, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(macromolecule, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(macromolecule, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(macromolecule, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(macromolecule, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cysteine, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(disaccharide, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cysteine, is good for)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(macromolecule, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(macromolecule, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(polysaccharide, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(disaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(disaccharide, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cysteine, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cysteine, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cysteine, is good for)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cysteine, is good for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(polysaccharide, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(polysaccharide, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(macromolecule, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(macromolecule, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cysteine, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(disaccharide, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cysteine, is good for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(macromolecule, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(polysaccharide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(macromolecule, has quality worth)