pond: be at park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.65
, shallow water
Weight: 0.65
, fresh water
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.62
Siblings creek
Weight: 0.36
, river
Weight: 0.36
, marsh
Weight: 0.35
, sea water
Weight: 0.35
, salt water
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at park 1.00
be view in national park 0.83
be used to recreation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(river, be view in national park)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(creek, be at park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(river, be used to recreation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(pond, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(creek, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(creek, be at park)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(pond, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(river, be view in national park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(river, be view in national park)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(pond, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(river, be used to recreation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(river, be used to recreation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(pond, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(pond, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(pond, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pond, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(pond, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pond, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(creek, be at park)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(river, be used to recreation)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(river, be view in national park)