pond: be in taiga

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.65
, shallow water
Weight: 0.65
, fresh water
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.62
Siblings bog
Weight: 0.40
, koi
Weight: 0.38
, creek
Weight: 0.36
, wetland
Weight: 0.36
, river
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in taiga 1.00
were in taiga 0.98
be in taiga formed 0.94
were in taiga formed 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(pond, be in taiga)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pond, were in taiga)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pond, were in taiga)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pond, were in taiga)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(pond, be in taiga formed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pond, were in taiga formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pond, were in taiga formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(pond, be in taiga formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pond, were in taiga formed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(pond, were in taiga formed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(pond, be in taiga formed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pond, be in taiga formed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pond, were in taiga)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pond, be in taiga)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(pond, be in taiga)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pond, be in taiga)