pond: was where located

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.65
, shallow water
Weight: 0.65
, fresh water
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.62
Siblings bog
Weight: 0.40
, koi
Weight: 0.38
, creek
Weight: 0.36
, wetland
Weight: 0.36
, river
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was where located 1.00
was where once located 0.96
was located 0.95
was once located 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(pond, was where located)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pond, was where once located)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pond, was located)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pond, was once located)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pond, was located)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(pond, was located)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(pond, was where once located)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pond, was located)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pond, was once located)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pond, was where once located)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pond, was once located)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pond, was where once located)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pond, was once located)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pond, was where located)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pond, was where located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pond, was where located)