pool: be at back yard

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, program
Weight: 0.58
, shallow water
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fountain
Weight: 0.62
, pond
Weight: 0.33
, deck
Weight: 0.32
, competition
Weight: 0.32
, picnic table
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at back yard 1.00
wants to run after ball 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at back yard)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(competition, wants to run after ball)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pool, be at back yard)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(competition, wants to run after ball)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(competition, wants to run after ball)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pool, be at back yard)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(pool, be at back yard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(pool, be at back yard)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pool, be at back yard)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at back yard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pool, be at back yard)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pool, be at back yard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at back yard)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(competition, wants to run after ball)