pool: be used to add interest to event

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, program
Weight: 0.58
, shallow water
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fountain
Weight: 0.62
, pond
Weight: 0.33
, deck
Weight: 0.32
, competition
Weight: 0.32
, picnic table
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to add interest to event 1.00
be used to add money to group effort 0.80
be at sport event 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pool, be used to add interest to event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(competition, be at sport event)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pool, be used to add interest to event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(competition, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(competition, be at sport event)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pool, be used to add interest to event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(pool, be used to add interest to event)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pool, be used to add interest to event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pool, be used to add money to group effort)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pool, be used to add interest to event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pool, be used to add money to group effort)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(pool, be used to add interest to event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(pool, be used to add money to group effort)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pool, be used to add interest to event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pool, be used to add money to group effort)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(pool, be used to add interest to event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pool, be used to add interest to event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pool, be used to add interest to event)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pool, be used to add interest to event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pool, be used to add interest to event)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pool, be used to add interest to event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(competition, be at sport event)