pool: have breaks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents swimming pool
Weight: 0.86
, event
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.59
Siblings fountain
Weight: 0.62
, clo
Weight: 0.42
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.33
, synchronized swimming
Weight: 0.33
, deck
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have breaks 1.00
do breaks 0.97
have fifteen breaks 0.87
have fifteen minute breaks 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(swimming pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pool, have breaks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, have breaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, have breaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(swimming pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(pool, have breaks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(pool, have breaks)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(pool, do breaks)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pool, do breaks)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pool, do breaks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(pool, do breaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pool, have breaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pool, have breaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(swimming pool, have breaks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(pool, have breaks)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(swimming pool, have breaks)