poop: be at in zimbabwe

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, word
Weight: 0.54
, object
Weight: 0.43
, reason
Weight: 0.40
, animal
Weight: 0.40
Siblings dog poop
Weight: 0.37
, pee
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34
, fart
Weight: 0.34
, vomit
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at in zimbabwe 1.00
be at africa 0.84
be at north america 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(animal, be at africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poop, be at in zimbabwe)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(animal, be at north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poop, be at in zimbabwe)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(poop, be at in zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(animal, be at africa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(poop, be at in zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(animal, be at north america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(poop, be at in zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at africa)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(poop, be at in zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at north america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(animal, be at africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(poop, be at in zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(poop, be at in zimbabwe)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(animal, be at north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(poop, be at in zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(poop, be at in zimbabwe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(poop, be at in zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(poop, be at in zimbabwe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(poop, be at in zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poop, be at in zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(poop, be at in zimbabwe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(poop, be at in zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poop, be at in zimbabwe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(poop, be at in zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(animal, be at africa)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(poop, be at in zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(animal, be at north america)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(poop, be at in zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(animal, be at africa)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(poop, be at in zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(animal, be at north america)