pop music: sound same

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents music
Weight: 0.71
, rock music
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.62
, media
Weight: 0.61
Siblings classical music
Weight: 0.74
, country music
Weight: 0.70
, rap music
Weight: 0.59
, rock n roll
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
sound same 1.00
is same 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(country music, sound same)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(classical music, sound same)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rap music, sound same)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(rap music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(rap music, sound same)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(country music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(country music, sound same)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(classical music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(classical music, sound same)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(pop music, sound same)

Similarity expansion

0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pop music, is same)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(pop music, is same)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is same)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(pop music, is same)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pop music, sound same)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pop music, sound same)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rap music, sound same)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(country music, sound same)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pop music, sound same)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(classical music, sound same)