pop: be skateboard decks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.60
, sound
Weight: 0.58
, artist
Weight: 0.56
, singer
Weight: 0.56
Siblings music
Weight: 0.64
, hound dog
Weight: 0.56
, punk rock
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be skateboard decks 1.00
be skateboard decks built 0.97
be lite skateboard decks 0.94
be lite skateboard decks built 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(pop, be skateboard decks)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pop, be skateboard decks built)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(pop, be skateboard decks built)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pop, be skateboard decks built)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(pop, be lite skateboard decks built)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(pop, be lite skateboard decks built)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(pop, be lite skateboard decks built)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pop, be lite skateboard decks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(pop, be lite skateboard decks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pop, be lite skateboard decks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(pop, be skateboard decks built)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(pop, be lite skateboard decks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(pop, be lite skateboard decks built)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pop, be skateboard decks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pop, be skateboard decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pop, be skateboard decks)