popcorn: be more expensive at movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, beverage
Weight: 0.56
Siblings pretzel
Weight: 0.36
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.36
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35
, soda
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive at movies 1.00
be popular at movies 0.90
be for movies 0.90
be with movies 0.89
be good for movies 0.88
go with movies 0.88
thing at movies 0.87
be good with movies 0.87
be related to movies 0.86
be expensive at movie theater 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(popcorn, go with movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(popcorn, go with movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, go with movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(popcorn, be with movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(popcorn, be with movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be with movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(popcorn, go with movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be for movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be popular at movies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(popcorn, thing at movies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(popcorn, be for movies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be good for movies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(popcorn, be popular at movies)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(popcorn, be good for movies)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(popcorn, be with movies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be related to movies)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(popcorn, be for movies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(popcorn, thing at movies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(popcorn, be popular at movies)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(popcorn, be good for movies)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(popcorn, thing at movies)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(popcorn, be for movies)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(popcorn, be popular at movies)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(popcorn, be related to movies)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(popcorn, be good for movies)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(popcorn, be related to movies)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(popcorn, be related to movies)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, thing at movies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(popcorn, be more expensive at movies)