popper: do

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents philosopher
Weight: 0.61
, lure
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, liberal
Weight: 0.45
, surface
Weight: 0.43
Siblings jig
Weight: 0.33
, karl marx
Weight: 0.32
, john locke
Weight: 0.31
, denis diderot
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
do 1.00
feel good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(philosopher, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(popper, do)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(popper, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(philosopher, do)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(popper, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(philosopher, do)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(philosopher, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(popper, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(popper, do)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(popper, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(popper, do)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(popper, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(popper, feel good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(popper, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(popper, feel good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(popper, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(popper, feel good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(popper, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(popper, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(popper, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(popper, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(popper, do)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(popper, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(popper, do)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(popper, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(philosopher, do)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(popper, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(philosopher, do)