population: be in humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents force
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, state
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings first nations
Weight: 0.63
, homeless person
Weight: 0.61
, age
Weight: 0.60
, homeless
Weight: 0.57
, minority
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in humans 1.00
affects humans 0.84
be similar to species 0.76
be shaped by interactions between organisms in ther environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(population, be in humans)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(population, affects humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(population, affects humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(population, be similar to species)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(population, be shaped by interactions between organisms in ther environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(population, be shaped by interactions between organisms in ther environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(population, be similar to species)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(population, affects humans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(population, affects humans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(population, be shaped by interactions between organisms in ther environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(population, be shaped by interactions between organisms in ther environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(population, be similar to species)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(population, be similar to species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(population, be in humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(population, be in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(population, be in humans)