pornstar: have huge peeholes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents girl
Weight: 0.52
, model
Weight: 0.39
, stripper
Weight: 0.34
, star
Weight: 0.33
Siblings whore
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32
, alice
Weight: 0.31
, betty
Weight: 0.31
, girl scout
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have huge peeholes 1.00
have huge wangs 0.90
have huge loads 0.86
have huge penises 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(pornstar, have huge peeholes)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pornstar, have huge wangs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pornstar, have huge wangs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pornstar, have huge loads)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pornstar, have huge wangs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pornstar, have huge loads)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pornstar, have huge penises)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(pornstar, have huge penises)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pornstar, have huge loads)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(pornstar, have huge penises)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, have huge penises)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, have huge wangs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, have huge loads)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, have huge peeholes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pornstar, have huge peeholes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(pornstar, have huge peeholes)