pornstar: have loads

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents girl
Weight: 0.52
, model
Weight: 0.39
, stripper
Weight: 0.34
, star
Weight: 0.33
Siblings whore
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32
, alice
Weight: 0.31
, betty
Weight: 0.31
, girl scout
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have loads 1.00
have huge loads 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pornstar, have loads)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(pornstar, have loads)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pornstar, have loads)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, have huge loads)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pornstar, have loads)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pornstar, have huge loads)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pornstar, have loads)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pornstar, have huge loads)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(pornstar, have loads)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pornstar, have huge loads)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pornstar, have loads)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pornstar, have loads)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, have loads)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pornstar, have loads)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pornstar, have loads)