pornstar: have make

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents girl
Weight: 0.52
, model
Weight: 0.39
, stripper
Weight: 0.34
, star
Weight: 0.33
Siblings whore
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32
, alice
Weight: 0.31
, betty
Weight: 0.31
, girl scout
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have make 1.00
have peeholes 0.83
make money 0.82
have time 0.78
make good employees 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(pornstar, have make)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, have peeholes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, make money)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, make good employees)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, have time)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(pornstar, have peeholes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pornstar, have peeholes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(pornstar, make money)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(pornstar, have time)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pornstar, have peeholes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pornstar, have time)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(pornstar, have time)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pornstar, make money)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pornstar, make good employees)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pornstar, make money)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(pornstar, make good employees)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pornstar, make good employees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, have make)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pornstar, have make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pornstar, have make)