pornstar: is ugly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents girl
Weight: 0.52
, model
Weight: 0.39
, stripper
Weight: 0.34
, star
Weight: 0.33
Siblings whore
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32
, alice
Weight: 0.31
, betty
Weight: 0.31
, girl scout
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is ugly 1.00
tend ugly 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pornstar, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(pornstar, is ugly)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(pornstar, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pornstar, tend ugly)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(pornstar, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(pornstar, tend ugly)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pornstar, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pornstar, tend ugly)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pornstar, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, tend ugly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(pornstar, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pornstar, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, is ugly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pornstar, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pornstar, is ugly)