port: be served to left

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, source
Weight: 0.62
, city
Weight: 0.60
, red wine
Weight: 0.60
Siblings airport
Weight: 0.70
, ellis island
Weight: 0.68
, hull
Weight: 0.67
, cruise ship
Weight: 0.62
, manila
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served to left 1.00
be served in glass 0.88
be served in small glass 0.85
be on left 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(red wine, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(port, be served to left)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(port, be served to left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(red wine, be served in glass)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(port, be served to left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be served in glass)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(red wine, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(port, be served to left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(port, be served to left)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(port, be served to left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(port, be served to left)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(port, be served to left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(port, be served in glass)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(port, be served to left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(port, be served in glass)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(port, be served to left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(port, be served in small glass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(port, be served to left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(port, be served in small glass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(port, be served to left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(port, be served in small glass)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(port, be served to left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(port, be served to left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(port, be served to left)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(port, be served to left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(port, be served to left)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(port, be served to left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red wine, be served in glass)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(port, be served to left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red wine, be served in glass)