portsmouth: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	town Weight: 0.60 , city Weight: 0.60 , place Weight: 0.59 , club Weight: 0.58 , community Weight: 0.56
Siblings	liverpool Weight: 0.36 , birmingham Weight: 0.35 , sheffield Weight: 0.35 , charleston Weight: 0.35 , leeds Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(portsmouth, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(liverpool, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(portsmouth, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(liverpool, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(liverpool, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(portsmouth, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(portsmouth, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(portsmouth, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(portsmouth, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(portsmouth, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(portsmouth, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(portsmouth, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(portsmouth, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(liverpool, has quality bad)