poster: be with dissenting opinions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents image
Weight: 0.60
, man
Weight: 0.60
, way
Weight: 0.59
, drawing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings photograph
Weight: 0.34
, photo
Weight: 0.33
, cartoon
Weight: 0.33
, old man
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with dissenting opinions 1.00
be with dissenting opinions banned 0.97
be with opinions 0.88
be with opinions banned 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(poster, be with dissenting opinions)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(poster, be with dissenting opinions banned)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(poster, be with dissenting opinions banned)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(poster, be with opinions)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(poster, be with dissenting opinions banned)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(poster, be with opinions banned)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(poster, be with dissenting opinions banned)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(poster, be with opinions banned)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(poster, be with opinions)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(poster, be with opinions banned)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(poster, be with opinions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(poster, be with opinions)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(poster, be with opinions banned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(poster, be with dissenting opinions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(poster, be with dissenting opinions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(poster, be with dissenting opinions)