postman: compare watching

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.69
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, friend
Weight: 0.45
, person
Weight: 0.43
Siblings policeman
Weight: 0.37
, old man
Weight: 0.36
, young man
Weight: 0.36
, young woman
Weight: 0.35
, gardener
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare watching 1.00
watching tv 0.85
watching tv to game 0.83
watching tv to game of peek 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(postman, compare watching)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(postman, watching tv)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(postman, watching tv)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(postman, watching tv)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(postman, watching tv to game)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(postman, watching tv to game)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(postman, watching tv to game)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(postman, watching tv to game of peek)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(postman, watching tv to game of peek)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(postman, watching tv to game of peek)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(postman, watching tv)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(postman, watching tv to game)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(postman, watching tv to game of peek)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(postman, compare watching)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(postman, compare watching)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(postman, compare watching)