postman: is rings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.69
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, friend
Weight: 0.45
, person
Weight: 0.43
Siblings policeman
Weight: 0.37
, old man
Weight: 0.36
, young man
Weight: 0.36
, young woman
Weight: 0.35
, gardener
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is rings 1.00
is rings called 0.98
is rings twice 0.91
is rings twice called 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(postman, is rings)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(postman, is rings twice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(postman, is rings called)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(postman, is rings twice called)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(postman, is rings twice)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(postman, is rings called)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(postman, is rings called)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(postman, is rings called)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(postman, is rings twice)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(postman, is rings twice called)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(postman, is rings twice called)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(postman, is rings twice)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(postman, is rings twice called)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(postman, is rings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(postman, is rings)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(postman, is rings)