postmaster: be at post office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents office
Weight: 0.49
, man
Weight: 0.49
, officer
Weight: 0.46
, alias
Weight: 0.43
, clerk
Weight: 0.43
Siblings postman
Weight: 0.33
, post office
Weight: 0.32
, police officer
Weight: 0.31
, doctor office
Weight: 0.31
, dental office
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at post office 1.00
be at office 0.90
be used to post letter 0.84
man his post 0.81
be at office build 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(clerk, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(postmaster, be at post office)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(office, be at office)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(postmaster, be at post office)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(office, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(postmaster, be at post office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(office, be at office build)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(office, be at office)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(clerk, be at post office)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(clerk, be at post office)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(office, be at office)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(office, be at office build)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(postman, be at post office)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dental office, be at office build)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(post office, be used to post letter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(clerk, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(postmaster, be at post office)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(office, be at office)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(postmaster, be at post office)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(office, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(postmaster, be at post office)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(postman, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(postman, be at post office)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(post office, be used to post letter)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(post office, be used to post letter)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(dental office, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(dental office, be at office build)

Salient implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(postmaster, be at post office)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(postmaster, be at post office)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(postmaster, be at post office)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(postmaster, be at post office)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(postmaster, be at post office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(office, be at office)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(clerk, be at post office)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(office, be at office build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(post office, be used to post letter)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(dental office, be at office build)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(postman, be at post office)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(office, be at office)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(clerk, be at post office)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(postmaster, be at post office)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(office, be at office build)