pot: be at greenhouse

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.62
, container
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.58
, dish
Weight: 0.57
, device
Weight: 0.56
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.33
, cup
Weight: 0.33
, coffee cup
Weight: 0.33
, spoon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at greenhouse 1.00
be used to plant flower in 0.78
be at container garden 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(container, be at container garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pot, be at greenhouse)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pot, be at greenhouse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(container, be at container garden)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pot, be at greenhouse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(container, be at container garden)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(container, be at container garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(pot, be at greenhouse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pot, be at greenhouse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pot, be at greenhouse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(pot, be at greenhouse)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pot, be at greenhouse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pot, be used to plant flower in)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(pot, be at greenhouse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pot, be used to plant flower in)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pot, be at greenhouse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(pot, be used to plant flower in)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(pot, be at greenhouse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pot, be used to plant flower in)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pot, be at greenhouse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pot, be at greenhouse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pot, be at greenhouse)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pot, be at greenhouse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pot, be at greenhouse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pot, be at greenhouse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(container, be at container garden)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(pot, be at greenhouse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(container, be at container garden)