pot: be illegal in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.62
, container
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.58
, dish
Weight: 0.57
Siblings frying pan
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, spoon
Weight: 0.34
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in canada 1.00
be illegal in australia 0.92
be illegal in denmark 0.87
be illegal 0.80
is illegal 0.80
be illegal in countries 0.78
is when illegal 0.78
be illegal in countries in world 0.77
be illegal in us 0.76
be illegal in place 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(container, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pot, be illegal in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pot, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(container, is illegal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pot, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(container, is illegal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(container, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pot, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pot, be illegal in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pot, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(pot, be illegal in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(pot, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pot, be illegal in australia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(pot, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pot, be illegal in denmark)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pot, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pot, be illegal in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pot, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pot, be illegal in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pot, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(pot, is illegal)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pot, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pot, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pot, be illegal in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pot, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pot, be illegal in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pot, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(container, is illegal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(pot, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(container, is illegal)