pot: be legal in states

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, container
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.58
, dish
Weight: 0.57
Siblings frying pan
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, spoon
Weight: 0.34
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be legal in states 1.00
is legal 0.89
be legal in california 0.77
be legal in amsterdam 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cooking utensil, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pot, be legal in states)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pot, be legal in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, is legal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pot, be legal in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, is legal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cooking utensil, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pot, be legal in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pot, be legal in states)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pot, be legal in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(pot, be legal in states)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pot, be legal in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(pot, is legal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pot, be legal in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pot, is legal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pot, be legal in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pot, is legal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pot, be legal in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pot, is legal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pot, be legal in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(pot, be legal in california)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pot, be legal in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pot, be legal in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pot, be legal in states)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pot, be legal in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pot, be legal in states)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pot, be legal in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, is legal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pot, be legal in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, is legal)