potato: be after cooking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.69
, salad
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.65
, crop
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.75
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.74
, french fry
Weight: 0.57
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.38
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be after cooking 1.00
go after cooking 0.98
turn after cooking 0.96
be after hard cooking 0.95
be cooked eating 0.82
take longer cook 0.81
cook faster in when pieces 0.79
be cooked 0.79
is cooked 0.78
cook faster in when small pieces 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is cooked)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(french fry, is cooked)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french fry, is cooked)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(potato, be after cooking)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(potato, go after cooking)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(potato, turn after cooking)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(potato, go after cooking)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(potato, turn after cooking)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(potato, go after cooking)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(potato, turn after cooking)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(potato, go after cooking)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(potato, turn after cooking)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(potato, be cooked eating)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(potato, take longer cook)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(potato, be cooked eating)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(potato, be cooked eating)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(potato, take longer cook)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(potato, is cooked)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(potato, is cooked)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(potato, take longer cook)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(potato, is cooked)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(potato, take longer cook)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(potato, be cooked eating)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(potato, is cooked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(potato, be after cooking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(potato, be after cooking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(potato, be after cooking)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(french fry, is cooked)