potato: be at food market

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.69
, salad
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.65
, crop
Weight: 0.64
Siblings french fry
Weight: 0.57
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.38
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.37
, onion
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at food market 1.00
be at market 0.91
be at farmer market 0.80
be grow to use for food 0.78
be at fast food restaurant 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(vegetable, be grow to use for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(potato, be at food market)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(salad, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(potato, be at food market)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(vegetable, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(potato, be at food market)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be at market)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(salad, be at market)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be grow to use for food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at market)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be at market)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be grow to use for food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(onion, be at market)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be at fast food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(salad, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(potato, be at food market)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(vegetable, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(potato, be at food market)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(vegetable, be grow to use for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(potato, be at food market)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(onion, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(onion, be at market)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(french fry, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(french fry, be at fast food restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(potato, be at food market)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(potato, be at farmer market)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(potato, be at farmer market)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at farmer market)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(potato, be at farmer market)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at food market)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(potato, be at food market)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(vegetable, be grow to use for food)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(vegetable, be at market)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(salad, be at market)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(french fry, be at fast food restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(onion, be at market)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(vegetable, be grow to use for food)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(vegetable, be at market)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(potato, be at food market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(salad, be at market)