potato: be considered vegetables

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.69
, salad
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.65
, crop
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.75
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.74
, french fry
Weight: 0.57
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.38
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered vegetables 1.00
is vegetables 0.96
is vegetable 0.86
be cooked in water healthier than potatoes cooked in oil 0.81
be called potatoes 0.81
is breakfast vegetable 0.81
be healthier than potatoes 0.79
be in potato plants 0.79
be healthier than other potatoes 0.79
be better than potatoes 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vegetable, is vegetables)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(potato, be considered vegetables)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vegetable, is vegetables)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, is vegetables)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than other potatoes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than potatoes)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than potatoes)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, is vegetable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vegetable, is vegetables)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(potato, be considered vegetables)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(sweet potato, is vegetable)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, is vegetable)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than potatoes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be healthier than potatoes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than other potatoes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be healthier than other potatoes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(potato, be considered vegetables)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(potato, is vegetables)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(potato, is vegetables)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(potato, is vegetable)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(potato, is vegetables)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(potato, is vegetable)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(potato, is vegetables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(potato, be called potatoes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(potato, be healthier than potatoes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than potatoes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(potato, is vegetable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(potato, is vegetable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(potato, be called potatoes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(potato, be called potatoes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(potato, be called potatoes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(potato, be healthier than potatoes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(potato, be better than potatoes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(potato, be better than potatoes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(potato, be healthier than potatoes)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(potato, be better than potatoes)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(potato, be healthier than potatoes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(potato, be considered vegetables)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(vegetable, is vegetables)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sweet potato, is vegetable)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than potatoes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be healthier than potatoes)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be healthier than other potatoes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(potato, be considered vegetables)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(vegetable, is vegetables)