potato: explode in microwave

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.69
, salad
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.65
, crop
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.75
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.74
, french fry
Weight: 0.57
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.38
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
explode in microwave 1.00
go hard in microwave 0.88
cook faster in pressure cooker 0.77
stick to frying pan 0.76
cooked better and faster in pressure cooker 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(vegetable, cooked better and faster in pressure cooker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(potato, explode in microwave)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(vegetable, cooked better and faster in pressure cooker)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, cooked better and faster in pressure cooker)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, explode in microwave)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(vegetable, cooked better and faster in pressure cooker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(potato, explode in microwave)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(tomato sauce, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, explode in microwave)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(potato, explode in microwave)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(potato, stick to frying pan)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(potato, stick to frying pan)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(potato, stick to frying pan)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(potato, stick to frying pan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(potato, explode in microwave)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(potato, explode in microwave)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(vegetable, cooked better and faster in pressure cooker)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, explode in microwave)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(potato, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(vegetable, cooked better and faster in pressure cooker)