pottery: was expensive in ancient egypt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents handicraft
Weight: 0.70
, item
Weight: 0.61
, art
Weight: 0.59
, medium
Weight: 0.58
, artifact
Weight: 0.57
Siblings needlework
Weight: 0.37
, woodworking
Weight: 0.36
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.35
, quilting
Weight: 0.35
, vase
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was expensive in ancient egypt 1.00
was expensive in egypt 0.93
was important in ancient greece 0.90
was made in ancient greece 0.88
was important in ancient china 0.87
was ancient made 0.84
be important to medieval times 0.79
was important in greece 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pottery, was expensive in egypt)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pottery, was important in ancient greece)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pottery, was expensive in egypt)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pottery, was expensive in egypt)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pottery, was made in ancient greece)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pottery, was important in ancient china)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pottery, was ancient made)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pottery, was made in ancient greece)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(pottery, was made in ancient greece)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pottery, was important in ancient greece)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was expensive in egypt)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pottery, be important to medieval times)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(pottery, was important in ancient greece)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pottery, was important in greece)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pottery, was important in ancient china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pottery, was ancient made)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was made in ancient greece)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pottery, was important in ancient china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pottery, was ancient made)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pottery, was important in greece)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pottery, be important to medieval times)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(pottery, was important in greece)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pottery, be important to medieval times)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important in ancient greece)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was ancient made)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important in greece)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be important to medieval times)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important in ancient china)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pottery, was expensive in ancient egypt)