pouch: be similar to pocket

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.52
Siblings handbag
Weight: 0.33
, carton
Weight: 0.33
, jar
Weight: 0.33
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.33
, bag
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be similar to pocket 1.00
be at pocket 0.88
be at man pocket 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pouch, be similar to pocket)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, be at pocket)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(pouch, be similar to pocket)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(pocket knife, be at pocket)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, be at pocket)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(pouch, be similar to pocket)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(pouch, be similar to pocket)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pouch, be similar to pocket)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(pouch, be at man pocket)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(pouch, be similar to pocket)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pouch, be at man pocket)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pouch, be similar to pocket)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pouch, be at man pocket)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pouch, be similar to pocket)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(pouch, be at man pocket)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pouch, be similar to pocket)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pouch, be similar to pocket)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pouch, be similar to pocket)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(pouch, be similar to pocket)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pouch, be similar to pocket)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pouch, be similar to pocket)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(pocket knife, be at pocket)