power plant: be big and ugly

Related concepts

Parents	nuclear power plant Weight: 0.77 , plant Weight: 0.73 , factory Weight: 0.67 , transmission Weight: 0.67
Siblings	natural gas Weight: 0.70 , nuclear reactor Weight: 0.69 , power Weight: 0.67 , turbine Weight: 0.60 , sellafield Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be big and ugly	1.00
be nice to have	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(power plant, be big and ugly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(power, be nice to have)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(power plant, be big and ugly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(power, be nice to have) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(power, be nice to have)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(power plant, be big and ugly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(power plant, be big and ugly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(power plant, be big and ugly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(power plant, be big and ugly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(power plant, be big and ugly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(power plant, be big and ugly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(power plant, be big and ugly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(power plant, be big and ugly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(power, be nice to have)