power plant: be called plants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.77
, plant
Weight: 0.73
, utility
Weight: 0.68
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.70
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.69
, hydro
Weight: 0.68
, power
Weight: 0.67
, turbine
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called plants 1.00
be different from other plants 0.86
be different from oil fired power plant 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be different from other plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(power plant, be called plants)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be different from oil fired power plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(power plant, be called plants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be different from other plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be different from oil fired power plant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be different from other plants)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be different from oil fired power plant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be different from other plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(power plant, be called plants)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be different from oil fired power plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(power plant, be called plants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(power plant, be called plants)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be different from other plants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be different from oil fired power plant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(power plant, be different from other plants)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(power plant, be different from oil fired power plant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(power plant, be different from other plants)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(power plant, be different from other plants)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(power plant, be different from oil fired power plant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(power plant, be different from oil fired power plant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be called plants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(power plant, be called plants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be different from oil fired power plant)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be different from other plants)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be different from oil fired power plant)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(power plant, be called plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be different from other plants)