power plant: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.77
, plant
Weight: 0.73
, utility
Weight: 0.68
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.70
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.69
, hydro
Weight: 0.68
, power
Weight: 0.67
, turbine
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
be good for environment 0.80
be bad for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(power plant, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(power plant, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(plant, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(power plant, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(power plant, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(plant, be good for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(plant, be good for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hydro, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(turbine, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(plant, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(power plant, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(turbine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(turbine, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(hydro, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hydro, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(natural gas, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(power plant, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(power plant, be good for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(power plant, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(power plant, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(power plant, be good for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(power plant, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(power plant, be good for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be good for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(power plant, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(plant, be good for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hydro, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(turbine, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(plant, be good for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)