prairie dog: be adapted living

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.79
, animal
Weight: 0.75
, rodent
Weight: 0.72
, species
Weight: 0.69
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings dog
Weight: 0.40
, cougar
Weight: 0.38
, llama
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be adapted living 1.00
be adapted living in grasslands 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(species, be adapted living in grasslands)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(prairie dog, be adapted living)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(prairie dog, be adapted living)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(species, be adapted living in grasslands)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, be adapted living)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(species, be adapted living in grasslands)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(species, be adapted living in grasslands)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(prairie dog, be adapted living)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, be adapted living)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(prairie dog, be adapted living)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(prairie dog, be adapted living)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(prairie dog, be adapted living)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(prairie dog, be adapted living in grasslands)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(prairie dog, be adapted living)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(prairie dog, be adapted living in grasslands)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(prairie dog, be adapted living)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, be adapted living in grasslands)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(prairie dog, be adapted living)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, be adapted living in grasslands)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(prairie dog, be adapted living)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(prairie dog, be adapted living)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, be adapted living)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(prairie dog, be adapted living)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(prairie dog, be adapted living)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, be adapted living)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(species, be adapted living in grasslands)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(prairie dog, be adapted living)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(species, be adapted living in grasslands)