prairie dog: be called dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.79
, animal
Weight: 0.75
, rodent
Weight: 0.72
, species
Weight: 0.69
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings dog
Weight: 0.40
, cougar
Weight: 0.38
, llama
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called dogs 1.00
attack male prairie dogs 0.76
speak with animals 0.76
attack prairie dogs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(prairie dog, be called dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, attack male prairie dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, speak with animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, attack prairie dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(prairie dog, attack prairie dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(prairie dog, attack prairie dogs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(prairie dog, speak with animals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, attack prairie dogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(prairie dog, attack male prairie dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, speak with animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(prairie dog, speak with animals)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, attack male prairie dogs)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(prairie dog, attack male prairie dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, be called dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(prairie dog, be called dogs)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(prairie dog, be called dogs)