prairie dog: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.79
, animal
Weight: 0.75
, rodent
Weight: 0.72
, species
Weight: 0.69
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings dog
Weight: 0.40
, cougar
Weight: 0.38
, llama
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cougar, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(prairie dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cougar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cougar, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(prairie dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(prairie dog, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(prairie dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(prairie dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(prairie dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(prairie dog, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cougar, has quality bad)