prairie dog: protected themselves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.79
, animal
Weight: 0.75
, rodent
Weight: 0.72
, species
Weight: 0.69
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings dog
Weight: 0.40
, cougar
Weight: 0.38
, llama
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
protected themselves 1.00
protect themselves 0.90
defend themselves 0.82
protects from predators 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rodent, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prairie dog, protected themselves)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(rodent, defend themselves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rodent, defend themselves)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(llama, protect themselves)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cougar, defend themselves)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cougar, protect themselves)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rodent, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, protected themselves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cougar, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cougar, protect themselves)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(llama, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(llama, protect themselves)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cougar, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cougar, defend themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(prairie dog, protected themselves)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(prairie dog, protect themselves)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(prairie dog, protect themselves)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, protect themselves)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(prairie dog, defend themselves)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, protect themselves)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(prairie dog, protects from predators)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(prairie dog, defend themselves)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, defend themselves)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prairie dog, protects from predators)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, defend themselves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, protects from predators)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, protects from predators)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, protected themselves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prairie dog, protected themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(rodent, defend themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cougar, protect themselves)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cougar, defend themselves)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(llama, protect themselves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(prairie dog, protected themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(rodent, defend themselves)